Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
After car accidents, the right to claim diminution in value depends on the country or state [2] and who is at fault. [3]Major car rental companies do charge their renters for diminished value after accidents, unless the renter pays for a Damage waiver (Avis, [4] Budget, [5] National, [6] Thrifty [7]).
Based on this example, an auto insurer would pay out a maximum of $1,500 for a diminished value claim on this vehicle. However, based on the damage and mileage, the final calculated estimate for a ...
In Michigan diminished value claims are limited to $3,000 maximum by the state's mini-tort legislation. There is no diminished value claims in the state of Michigan. The Mini-Tort legislation is for the uninsured portion, typically the deductible if insured, of the damages to the vehicle, up to a maximum of $3,000.
The Kelley Blue Book automatically rates any salvage vehicle as "poor" and does not value it at all. [12] The value of a vehicle with a salvage title is generally 65-75% lower than the vehicle's estimated value. If the vehicle is rebuilt to a road worthy condition and has passed State inspection, the difference in price is 60-70% of "fair" KBB.
Vehicle emissions inspection station in Wisconsin. Arizona – biennially, in Phoenix and Tucson metro areas only, depending on age and type of vehicle. [27]California – biennially for all vehicles from out-of-state, regardless of age; and all vehicles made after 1975 which are more than six years old in all or some zip codes in 41 out of 58 counties.
In Wisconsin, however, many new laws become effective as soon as the governor signs them. That means 2025 will not kick off with a wave of new rules. Wisconsin, instead, will see some technical ...
The National Insurance Crime Bureau released a new report this summer that revealed the top 10 most stolen car models nationwide and in each U.S. state last year.. According to the report, vehicle ...
Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. 146 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether the excessive fines clause of the Constitution's Eighth Amendment applies to state and local governments.