enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Symbolic speech - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_speech

    Symbolic speech is a legal term in United States law used to describe actions that purposefully and discernibly convey a particular message or statement to those viewing it. [1] Symbolic speech is recognized as being protected under the First Amendment as a form of speech, but this is not expressly written as such in the document.

  3. Government speech - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_speech

    The government speech doctrine establishes that the government may advance its speech without requiring viewpoint neutrality when the government itself is the speaker. Thus, when the state is the speaker, it may make content based choices. The simple principle has broad implications, and has led to contentious disputes within the Supreme Court. [1]

  4. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines...

    Black, who had long believed that disruptive "symbolic speech" was not constitutionally protected, wrote, "While I have always believed that under the First and Fourteenth Amendments neither the State nor the Federal Government has any authority to regulate or censor the content of speech, I have never believed that any person has a right to ...

  5. Opinion: When does government speech violate the 1st Amendment?

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-does-government-speech...

    The government encouraging them to remove false speech only violates the 1st Amendment if it can be proved that the government caused, and will cause in the future, speech to be blocked.

  6. United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech...

    The government is not permitted to fire an employee based on the employee's speech if three criteria are met: the speech addresses a matter of public concern; the speech is not made pursuant to the employee's job duties, but rather the speech is made in the employee's capacity as a citizen; [47] and the damage inflicted on the government by the ...

  7. Legal expert: Will the Supreme Court greatly limit speech by ...

    www.aol.com/legal-expert-supreme-court-greatly...

    Both cases pose the question of when speech by government officials violates the First Amendment. The leading Supreme Court precedent, Bantam Books v. Sullivan, was decided in 1963.

  8. Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.

  9. Symbol - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol

    A symbolic action is an action that symbolizes or signals what the actor wants or believes. The action conveys meaning to the viewers. The action conveys meaning to the viewers. Symbolic action may overlap with symbolic speech , such as the use of flag burning to express hostility or saluting the flag to express patriotism. [ 19 ]