enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Prosperity...

    Bonta, 141 S.Ct. 2373 (2021), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the disclosure of donors to non-profit organizations. The case challenged California's requirement that non-profit organizations disclose the identity of their donors to the state's Attorney General as a precondition of soliciting donations in the state.

  3. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of...

    National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 585 U.S. 755 (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the constitutionality of California's FACT Act, which mandated that crisis pregnancy centers provide certain disclosures about state services.

  4. Moore v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Regents_of_the...

    Moore's lawsuit alleged that Golde had been aware of the potential for financial benefit when medical consent was obtained, but he had concealed that from Moore. The claim was rejected by the Los Angeles Superior Court, but in 1988, the California Court of Appeal ruled that blood and tissue samples were one's own personal property and that ...

  5. Supreme Court says charities do not have to disclose the ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-says-charities-not...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Supreme Court wipes out anti-corruption law that bars ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-wipes-anti...

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down part of a federal anti-corruption law that makes it a crime for state and local officials to take gifts valued at more than $5,000 from a donor who had ...

  7. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the threatened ...

  8. US Supreme Court justices disclose Bali hotel stay, Beyoncé ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-justices...

    U.S. Supreme Court justices reported receiving gifts including a stay in a Bali hotel and tickets to a Beyoncé concert, as well as nearly $1.6 million in book advances and royalties in annual ...

  9. Astrue v. Capato - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrue_v._Capato

    Astrue v. Capato, 566 U.S. 541 (2012), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that children conceived after a parent's death are not entitled to Social Security Survivors benefits if the laws in the state that the parent's will was signed in forbid it. [1]