enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lawful interception - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawful_interception

    In June 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement officers need a search warrant before accessing information from internet service providers about users’ identities. The context behind this 8-0 ruling is an adolescent Saskatchewan man charged with possessing and distributing child pornography. [ 14 ]

  3. Electronic Communications Privacy Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Communications...

    In April, it argued in a federal court in Colorado that it ought to have access to some e-mails without a search warrant. And federal law enforcement officials, citing technology advances, plan to ask for new regulations that would smooth their ability to perform legal wiretaps of various Internet communications.

  4. In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Application_of_the...

    The New York Times called the case "a significant victory for law enforcement." [ 3 ] The Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote that the opinion was based on a "misguided belief that a user understands and voluntarily chooses to reveal their location to the cell phone provider and ultimately the government through the user's own free will."

  5. Third-party doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine

    Followed by the states in 1791, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution was enacted in 1792, holding: . The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place ...

  6. Searches incident to a lawful arrest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searches_incident_to_a...

    Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.

  7. Rule 41 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_41

    In 2016 an amendment allowed judges to issue warrants allowing the FBI and other federal law enforcement agencies to use remote access tools to access (hack) computers outside the jurisdiction in which the warrant was granted. [1] [2] The amendment to the subdivision (b) reads as follows:

  8. Audit: ISP not following law in processing ID for legal gun ...

    www.aol.com/news/audit-isp-not-following-law...

    An Auditor General review of the Illinois State Police’s handling of Firearm Owner’s Identification Card and Concealed Carry License applications shows ISP is not following the law.

  9. Warrantless searches in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantless_searches_in...

    Warrantless searches are searches and seizures conducted without court-issued search warrants.. In the United States, warrantless searches are restricted under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, which states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not ...