Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The ECJ is the senior court of the CJEU, and it consists of 27 judges, one from each member state, and 11 Advocates General. [2] The Advocates General have the same status as the other judges, but they are also responsible for submitting an independent opinion of the case to the judge panel before they make their decision.
Leading cases on competition law include Consten & Grundig v Commission and United Brands v Commission. Case C-185/95: Baustahlgewebe v. Commission. In 1989 the European Commission had adopted a determination that 14 producers of welded steel mesh had engaged in unlawful restrictions of competition. [11]
H.N. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and others, [2012] IESC 58; [2013] 1 IR 142 (also referred to as Nawaz v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and others), is an Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court referred the following question to the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU) for preliminary ruling in accordance with Article 267 Treaty on the ...
NH appealed to higher courts, ultimately leading to the Corte suprema di cassazione staying proceedings and referring two questions to the CJEU. The questions focused on the interpretation of Directive 2000/78 and concerned the material scope of this instrument, as well as the eligibility of a lawyers’ association to initiate legal action in ...
The CJEU is the chief judicial authority of the EU and oversees the uniform application and interpretation of European Union law, in co-operation with the national judiciary of the member states. [4] The CJEU also resolves legal disputes between national governments and EU institutions, and may take action against EU institutions on behalf of ...
Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner [2016] IESC 18 [1] is an Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court referred the question of what constitutes as personal data to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [2] In this case, the Court saw for the first time an applicant contending that an exam script is his personal data.
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that the European Stability Mechanism was lawful. The CJEU sat in full court, a rare occurrence when all judges preside. [ 7 ] The Court found Council Decision 2011/199/EU to be lawful as the decision's proposed "amendment creates no legal basis for the EU to be able to undertake any action ...
Where that is the case, the Community principle of equal treatment requires that, in the State of employment, the personal and family circumstances of a foreign non-resident be taken into account in the same way as those of resident nationals and that the same tax benefits should be granted to him.