enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Crawford v. Marion County Election Board - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Marion_County...

    [4] [5] The circuit court was deeply divided, with the dissent characterizing the law as a thinly-veiled attempt to disenfranchise low-income Democratic Party voters. [6] The lead plaintiff was William Crawford , who was a Democratic member of the Indiana House of Representatives from Indianapolis from 1972 to 2012.

  3. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brnovich_v._Democratic...

    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, 594 U.S. 647 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to voting rights established by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), and specifically the applicability of Section 2's general provision barring discrimination against minorities in state and local election laws in the wake of the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v.

  4. Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berger_v._North_Carolina...

    In 2013, the North Carolina General Assembly passed, and Governor Pat McCrory signed, HB 589, a voter identification law. A divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit invalidated that law in 2016, and the Supreme Court later denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in 2017 after disputes about whether North Carolina's new governor, Roy Cooper, could withdraw ...

  5. Thornburg v. Gingles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornburg_v._Gingles

    Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a unanimous Court found that "the legacy of official discrimination ... acted in concert with the multimember districting scheme to impair the ability of "cohesive groups of black voters to participate equally in the political process and to elect candidates of their choice."

  6. Wisconsin Supreme Court rules Republican had no right to ...

    lite.aol.com/politics/story/0001/20250218/508cdf...

    Instead, it ruled 4-3 to dismiss the case, with four liberal justices in the majority and three conservative justices dissenting. The Supreme Court ruled that the Racine County voter who brought the lawsuit, the county’s Republican Party chairman, Ken Brown, was not “aggrieved” under state law and therefore was not permitted to sue.

  7. Wisconsin top court's new liberal majority allows for ballot ...

    www.aol.com/news/wisconsin-top-courts-liberal...

    (Reuters) -A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way for voters to be able to return absentee ballots through drop boxes, with the court's new liberal majority overturning a ...

  8. Democrats eye Wisconsin high court's new liberal majority to ...

    www.aol.com/news/democrats-eye-wisconsin-high...

    Democrats in the perennial battleground state focused on abortion to elect a liberal majority to the court for the first time in 15 years. ... voter ID, the 12-year-old law that effectively ended ...

  9. Advocates say Supreme Court must preserve new, mostly ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/advocates-supreme-court-must...

    Voting rights advocates said Wednesday they will go to the Supreme Court in hopes of preserving a new majority Black congressional district in Louisiana for the fall elections, the latest step in ...