enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

3. Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_3_of_the_Human...

   Lord Hoffmann in a case, R (Simms) v Home Secretary, which bridged the introduction of the Human Rights Act, said: [10] Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights. The Human Rights Act 1998 will not detract from this power.

4. R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Daly)_v_Secretary_of...

   R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26 is a UK constitutional law case of the House of Lords case on the rights of a prisoner when his cell is searched by prison officers.

5. List of judgements of the House of Lords - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_judgements_of_the...

   This page was last edited on 24 October 2024, at 16:25 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

6. A v Secretary of State for the Home Department - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56 (also known as the Belmarsh 9 case) is a UK human rights case heard before the House of Lords.It held that the indefinite detention of foreign prisoners in Belmarsh without trial under section 23 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

7. R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Immigration ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Secretary_of_State_for...

   This case established a precedent for British citizens to secure UK immigration rights for their non-European spouses, who are unable to join their partners because of several changes in UK immigration law aimed at reducing net migration.