Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[4] [5] [6] In 1960, the year of the latest comprehensive inquiry, [7] 7% of federal property had enclave status. Of the land with federal enclave status, 57% (4% of federal property, almost all in Alaska and Hawaii) were under "concurrent" state jurisdiction. The remaining 43% (3% of federal property), on which some state laws do not apply ...
Where removal jurisdiction exists, the defendant may remove the action to federal court by filing a notice of removal in the federal district court within 30 days after receiving the complaint. The defendant must file a copy of the notice of removal in the state court and must notify all other parties of the removal.
Later in the month, the lawsuit was removed to federal court. James requested on December 7 that the suit be dismissed, [150] and the following week, requested as much on the basis that she has no connection to Florida. [151] On December 21, federal judge Donald Middlebrooks dismissed the suit, [152] [153] and Trump withdrew it on January 20 ...
A federal judge is set to hear a lawsuit by 22 states challenging Trump's executive order that could revoke birthright ... The order would not impact the legal status of children born prior to Feb ...
A judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought against the state of New Hampshire after government officials removed a historical marker dedicated to a feminist and labor activist who also led the U.S ...
Columnist E Jean Carroll claims Donald Trump raped her in Manhattan department store in 1990s
The issue is whether the law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement. The Court ruled that sections 3, 5(C), and 6 of S. B. 1070 were preempted by federal law but left other parts of the law intact, including a provision that allowed law enforcement to investigate a person's immigration status.
Case history; Prior: Judgment for defendants affirmed, 537 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2008), cert. granted, 556 U.S. 1234 (2009).: Holding; The dual for-cause limitations on the removal of members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board contravene the Constitution's separation of powers, but the unconstitutional limitations are severable from the remainder of the statute.