Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This equivalence, notably formalized in Kuhn's theorem, simplifies the analysis of such games. [4] It is a core component of how game theorists analyze extensive-form games. The formal definition of perfect recall involves the concept of information sets in extensive-form games. It ensures that if a player reaches a certain information set, the ...
Separately, game theory has played a role in online algorithms; in particular, the k-server problem, which has in the past been referred to as games with moving costs and request-answer games. [125] Yao's principle is a game-theoretic technique for proving lower bounds on the computational complexity of randomized algorithms , especially online ...
In the game of Chomp strategy stealing shows that the first player has a winning strategy in any rectangular board (other than 1x1). In the game of Sylver coinage, strategy stealing has been used to show that the first player can win in certain positions called "enders". [4] In all of these examples the proof reveals nothing about the actual ...
One of the most important concepts in the theory of combinatorial games is that of the sum of two games, which is a game where each player may choose to move either in one game or the other at any point in the game, and a player wins when his opponent has no move in either game. This way of combining games leads to a rich and powerful ...
In game theory, Kuhn's theorem relates perfect recall, mixed and unmixed strategies and their expected payoffs. It was formalized by Harold W. Kuhn in 1953. [1]The theorem states that in a game where players may remember all of their previous moves/states of the game available to them, for every mixed strategy there is a behavioral strategy that has an equivalent payoff (i.e. the strategies ...
The revelation principle is a fundamental result in mechanism design, social choice theory, and game theory which shows it is always possible to design a strategy-resistant implementation of a social decision-making mechanism (such as an electoral system or market). [1] It can be seen as a kind of mirror image to Gibbard's theorem.
Below, the normal form for both of these games is shown as well. The first game is simply sequential―when player 2 makes a choice, both parties are already aware of whether player 1 has chosen O(pera) or F(ootball). The second game is also sequential, but the dotted line shows player 2's information set. This is the common way to show that ...
A third example of Parrondo's paradox is drawn from the field of gambling. Consider playing two games, Game A and Game B with the following rules. For convenience, define to be our capital at time t, immediately before we play a game. Winning a game earns us $1 and losing requires us to surrender $1.