Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Polybutylene plumbing was used in several million homes built in the United States from around 1978 to 1997. Problems with leaks and broken pipes led to a class action lawsuit, Cox v. Shell Oil, that was settled for $1 billion. [13] [14] The leaks were associated with degradation of polybutylene exposed to chlorinated water. [15]
A cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) pipe. Cross-linked polyethylene, commonly abbreviated PEX, XPE or XLPE, is a form of polyethylene with cross-links.It is used predominantly in building services pipework systems, hydronic radiant heating and cooling systems, domestic water piping, insulation for high tension (high voltage) electrical cables, and baby play mats.
Keele Valley Landfill#Resident class action lawsuit; Kemper Corporation#Class-action lawsuit; Kids for cash scandal#Victim lawsuits; Kweku Hanson#Class action lawsuit against Ocwen Federal FSB; Lead contamination in Washington, D.C. drinking water#Class-action lawsuit; Long-term effects of benzodiazepines#Class-action lawsuit; Lowe's#Lawsuits
The class action settlement reached with Chemtool and its parent company Lubrizol Corp. includes an estimated 2,700 homeowners and tenants who lived within 3 miles of the lubricant production ...
Facebook recently paid 1.4 million Illinois residents $397 in 2022 as part of a class action lawsuit for facial recognition breaches through its “Tag Suggestions” feature, per CNBC. Google is ...
On this page, environmental lawsuit means "a lawsuit where the well-being of an environmental asset or the well-being of a set of environmental assets is in dispute". Also on this page, lawsuit with environmental relevance means "a lawsuit where a non-environmental entity or a set of non-environmental entities is in dispute, but whose outcome has relevance for an environmental asset or for a ...
The lawsuits allege that the company's high-voltage transmission towers. Victims of the Los Angeles wildfires, likely the costliest in U.S. history, are seizing upon a unique California legal ...
Northern Pipeline Construction Company v. Marathon Pipe Line Company, 458 U.S. 50 (1982), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Article III jurisdiction could not be conferred on non-Article III courts (i.e. courts without the independence and protection given to Article III judges).