enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Transitive dependency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_dependency

    B → C direct dependency relationship exists. Then the functional dependency A → C is a transitive dependency (which follows the axiom of transitivity). In database normalization, one of the important features of third normal form is that it excludes certain types of transitive dependencies.

  3. Third normal form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_normal_form

    A database relation (e.g. a database table) is said to meet third normal form standards if all the attributes (e.g. database columns) are functionally dependent on solely a key, except the case of functional dependency whose right hand side is a prime attribute (an attribute which is strictly included into some key).

  4. Functional dependency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_dependency

    A set S of functional dependencies is irreducible if the set has the following three properties: Each right set of a functional dependency of S contains only one attribute. Each left set of a functional dependency of S is irreducible. It means that reducing any one attribute from left set will change the content of S (S will lose some information).

  5. Database normalization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization

    An example of such a language is SQL, ... The Book table still has a transitive functional dependency ({Author Nationality} is dependent on {Author}, which is ...

  6. Armstrong's axioms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrong's_axioms

    Given a set of functional dependencies , an Armstrong relation is a relation which satisfies all the functional dependencies in the closure + and only those dependencies. . Unfortunately, the minimum-size Armstrong relation for a given set of dependencies can have a size which is an exponential function of the number of attributes in the dependencies conside

  7. Boyce–Codd normal form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyce–Codd_normal_form

    A relational schema R is in Boyce–Codd normal form if and only if for every one of its functional dependencies X → Y, at least one of the following conditions hold: [5] X → Y is a trivial functional dependency (Y ⊆ X), X is a superkey for schema R. [5]

  8. Fourth normal form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_normal_form

    A trivial multivalued dependency X Y is one where either Y is a subset of X, or X and Y together form the whole set of attributes of the relation. A functional dependency is a special case of multivalued dependency. In a functional dependency X → Y, every x determines exactly one y, never more than one.

  9. Second normal form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_normal_form

    In this example, {Manufacturer country} is the functionally dependent attribute which will be removed. Place those partial dependency-dependent attributes (i.e. {Manufacturer country}) in a relation where their corresponding determinant attributes are a candidate key (i.e. {Manufacturer}).