enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Table of divisors - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_divisors

    For example, 3 is a divisor of 21, since 21/7 = 3 (and therefore 7 is also a divisor of 21). If m is a divisor of n , then so is − m . The tables below only list positive divisors.

  3. Highly composite number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highly_composite_number

    the sequence of exponents must be non-increasing, that is ; otherwise, by exchanging two exponents we would again get a smaller number than n with the same number of divisors (for instance 18 = 2 1 × 3 2 may be replaced with 12 = 2 2 × 3 1; both have six divisors).

  4. Highest averages method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highest_averages_method

    Such population paradoxes occur by increasing the electoral quota, which can cause different states' remainders to respond erratically. [3]: Tbl.A7.2 Divisor methods also satisfy resource or house monotonicity, which says that increasing the number of seats in a legislature should not cause a state to lose a seat. [5] [3]: Cor.4.3.1

  5. Divisor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisor

    A divisor of that is not a trivial divisor is known as a non-trivial divisor (or strict divisor [6]). A nonzero integer with at least one non-trivial divisor is known as a composite number , while the units −1 and 1 and prime numbers have no non-trivial divisors.

  6. Superior highly composite number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_highly_composite...

    The first 15 superior highly composite numbers, 2, 6, 12, 60, 120, 360, 2520, 5040, 55440, 720720, 1441440, 4324320, 21621600, 367567200, 6983776800 (sequence A002201 in the OEIS) are also the first 15 colossally abundant numbers, which meet a similar condition based on the sum-of-divisors function rather than the number of divisors. Neither ...

  7. Divisibility rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisibility_rule

    (1 × 153 × 75 + 2 × 15) + (1 × 37 − 3 × 18 + 2 × 60) = −180 + 103 = −77 The result −77 is divisible by seven, thus the original number 15751537186 is divisible by seven. Another digit pair method of divisibility by 7. Method. This is a non-recursive method to find the remainder left by a number on dividing by 7:

  8. Abundant number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundant_number

    In number theory, an abundant number or excessive number is a positive integer for which the sum of its proper divisors is greater than the number. The integer 12 is the first abundant number. The integer 12 is the first abundant number.

  9. Table of prime factors - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_prime_factors

    An economical number has been defined as a frugal number, but also as a number that is either frugal or equidigital. gcd( m , n ) ( greatest common divisor of m and n ) is the product of all prime factors which are both in m and n (with the smallest multiplicity for m and n ).