enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argument from silence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence

    The importance of an event to contemporary author plays a role in the decision to mention it, and historian Krishnaji Chitnis states that for an argument from silence to apply, it must be of interest and significance to the person expected to be recording it, else it may be ignored; e.g. while later historians have lauded Magna Carta as a great national document, contemporary authors did not ...

  3. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Argument from silence (argumentum ex silentio) – assuming that a claim is true based on the absence of textual or spoken evidence from an authoritative source, or vice versa. [ 68 ] Ignoratio elenchi (irrelevant conclusion, missing the point) – an argument that may in itself be valid, but does not address the issue in question.

  4. Argument from reason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_reason

    The argument from reason is a transcendental argument against metaphysical naturalism and for the existence of God (or at least a supernatural being that is the source of human reason). The best-known defender of the argument is C. S. Lewis. Lewis first defended the argument at length in his 1947 book, Miracles: A Preliminary Study.

  5. Undesigned coincidences - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undesigned_Coincidences

    In Christian apologetics, the argument from undesigned coincidences aims to support the historical reliability of the Bible.So named by J.J. Blunt, based on previous work by William Paley, [1] [2] an undesigned coincidence is said to have occurred when an account of one event in the Bible omits a piece or pieces of information which is filled in, seemingly coincidentally, by a different ...

  6. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    Diverting the argument to unrelated issues with a red herring (Ignoratio elenchi) Insulting someone's character (argumentum ad hominem) Assuming the conclusion of an argument, a kind of circular reasoning, also called "begging the question" (petitio principii) Making jumps in logic (non sequitur)

  7. Marcan priority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcan_priority

    Marcan priority (or Markan priority) is the hypothesis that the Gospel of Mark was the first of the three synoptic gospels to be written, and was used as a source by the other two (Matthew and Luke).

  8. Common Sayings Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Sayings_Source

    This argument is considered a straw man when one observes that Q is not extant, and that 72 logia of the 114 (63%) that are in Thomas, have parallels in the Synoptic Gospels. [2] If there was a Q , the Gospel of Thomas is more than a perfect fit, with two thirds of it appearing in the four canonical gospels alone

  9. Christ myth theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_myth_theory

    [q 3] [q 6] [q 7] Most mythicists employ a threefold argument: [6] they question the reliability of the Pauline epistles and the gospels to establish Jesus's historicity; they argue that information is lacking on Jesus in secular sources from the first and early second centuries; and they argue that early Christianity had syncretistic and ...