Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
While nations such as the United States and the United Kingdom were at first reluctant to place sanctions, by the late 1980s both countries, as well as 23 other nations, had passed laws placing various trade sanctions on South Africa. Economic sanctions against South Africa placed a significant pressure on the government that helped to end ...
South Africa, in response, expanded its Sasol production of synthetic crude. [79] All United Nations sanctions on South Africa ended over the Negotiations to end Apartheid, Resolution 919 and the 1994 South African elections, in which Nelson Mandela was elected as the first post-Apartheid president. When asked in 1993 if economic sanctions had ...
Since the end of apartheid, foreign trade in South Africa has increased, following the lifting of several sanctions and boycotts which were imposed as a means of ending apartheid. South Africa is the second largest producer of gold in Africa [ 1 ] and is the world's largest producer of chrome , manganese , platinum , vanadium , and vermiculite ...
The Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986 [1] was a law enacted by the United States Congress.The law imposed sanctions against South Africa and stated five preconditions for lifting the sanctions that would essentially end the system of apartheid, which the latter was under at the time.
When South Africa pulled out of the Commonwealth in 1961, the United Kingdom led resistance to calls for punitive monetary and trade sanctions. It had many key economic links and, in particular, benefited from trade with South Africa's gold mining industry. [12] There were also strategic motives for not severing all ties with the apartheid ...
The embargo had a direct impact on South Africa in a number of ways: Last-minute cancellation of the sale of D'Estienne d'Orves-class avisos and Agosta-class submarines by France. [3] [4] The cancelation of the purchase of Sa'ar 4-class missile boats from Israel, some of which had to be built covertly in South Africa instead.
The conference was not successful in persuading Britain to take up economic sanctions against South Africa. Rather, the British government remained firm in its view that the imposition of sanctions would be unconstitutional "because we do not accept that this situation in South Africa constitutes a threat to international peace and security and we do not, in any case, believe that sanctions ...
In October 1965, the Joint Intelligence Committee estimated that even a full trade embargo would fail to cripple Rhodesia's economy due to sanctions evasion enabled by Portuguese Mozambique and South Africa, but suggested that prolonged and severe economic pressure could induce the white electorate to overthrow the government.