Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In financial auditing of public companies in the United States, SOX 404 top–down risk assessment (TDRA) is a financial risk assessment performed to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX 404). Under SOX 404, management must test its internal controls; a TDRA is used to determine the scope of such testing. It is also ...
Analytical procedures, with conforming changes as of March 1, 2008 full-text: 03-09: 2012: Analytical procedures, with conforming changes as of March 1, 2012: 03-10: 2017: Analytical procedures, with conforming changes as of October 1, 2017: 04-01: 2006: Assessing and responding to audit risk in a financial statement audit full-text: 04-02: 2009
It serves to require the auditor to understand the client's accounting system and internal control system and to assess control risk and inherent risk. The objective is to determine the nature, timing and extent of substantive procedures in order to reduce audit risk to an acceptable low level.
risk assessment (risk identification, risk analysis, risk evaluation) risk treatment; monitoring and review "Risk assessment is the overall process of risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation" (ISO 31010) Risk can be assessed at any level of the company’s operations or goals.
Your inventory checklist for accounting might include: Update inventory and accounts payable if your company receives new stock daily. Record sales and stock adjustments to write off expired or ...
Risk Assessment Analytical Techniques Analytical techniques, if used appropriately, can serve as a tool in the risk assessment process. Since risk is an outcome of perception, analytical techniques help remove subjectivity, to a certain extent by collation and presentation of data in a systematic manner for assessment of potential impact and ...
Some researchers have criticised control self-assessment as a flawed approach as the way risk is defined and measured is unsophisticated. In particular, control self-assessment may understate risk by not identifying extreme downside risk. An extreme downside risk is a highly improbable event that would have catastrophic consequences if it occurred.
This typically involves review of the various risk assessments performed by the enterprise (e.g., strategic plans, competitive benchmarking, and SOX 404 top-down risk assessment), consideration of prior audits, and interviews with a variety of senior management. It is designed for identifying audit projects, not to identify, prioritize, and ...