Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
if P then Q, it is not the case that P and not Q ... The statement is true if and ... (U+2308 and U+2309) or by using a negation symbol and a reversed negation symbol ...
[2] [3] For example, if is "Spot runs", then "not " is "Spot does not run". An operand of a negation is called a negand or negatum. [4] Negation is a unary logical connective. It may furthermore be applied not only to propositions, but also to notions, truth values, or semantic values more generally.
If a statement's negation is false, then the statement is true (and vice versa). If a statement (or its contrapositive) and the inverse (or the converse) are both true or both false, then it is known as a logical biconditional .
Then we have by the law of excluded middle [clarification needed] (i.e. either must be true, or must not be true). Subsequently, since P → Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} , P {\displaystyle P} can be replaced by Q {\displaystyle Q} in the statement, and thus it follows that ¬ P ∨ Q {\displaystyle \neg P\lor Q} (i.e. either Q {\displaystyle Q ...
Logical connectives can be used to link zero or more statements, so one can speak about n-ary logical connectives. The boolean constants True and False can be thought of as zero-ary operators. Negation is a unary connective, and so on.
Double negation elimination and double negation introduction are two valid rules of replacement. They are the inferences that, if not not-A is true, then A is true, and its converse, that, if A is true, then not not-A is true, respectively. The rule allows one to introduce or eliminate a negation from a formal proof.
In most logical systems, one proves a statement of the form "P iff Q" by proving either "if P, then Q" and "if Q, then P", or "if P, then Q" and "if not-P, then not-Q". Proving these pairs of statements sometimes leads to a more natural proof, since there are not obvious conditions in which one would infer a biconditional directly.
Phrased another way, denying the antecedent occurs in the context of an indicative conditional statement and assumes that the negation of the antecedent implies the negation of the consequent. It is a type of mixed hypothetical syllogism that takes on the following form: [1] If P, then Q. Not P. Therefore, not Q. which may also be phrased as