Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Archimedes principle, relating buoyancy to the weight of displaced water, is an early example of a law in science. Another early one developed by Malthus is the population principle, now called the Malthusian principle. [8] Freud also wrote on principles, especially the reality principle necessary to keep the id and pleasure principle in check.
According to Professor Popkin, Chief Justice John Marshall imposed a clear statement rule: "where fundamental values were at stake, statutes would not be interpreted to impair such values, absent a clear statement in the legislation.” [2] Indeed, Marshall wrote in 1805 that "Where fundamental principles are overthrown, when the general system ...
The fifth and sixth examples are meaningful declarative sentences, but are not statements but rather matters of opinion or taste. Whether or not the sentence "Pegasus exists." is a statement is a subject of debate among philosophers. Bertrand Russell held that it is a (false) statement. [citation needed] Strawson held it is not a statement at all.
In philosophy and science, a first principle is a basic proposition or assumption that cannot be deduced from any other proposition or assumption. First principles in philosophy are from first cause [ 1 ] attitudes and taught by Aristotelians , and nuanced versions of first principles are referred to as postulates by Kantians .
A dogmatic falsificationist ignores that every observation is theory-impregnated. Being theory-impregnated means that it goes beyond direct experience. For example, the statement "Here is a glass of water" goes beyond experience, because the concepts of glass and water "denote physical bodies which exhibit a certain law-like behaviour" (Popper ...
The definition of a formal proof is intended to capture the concept of proofs as written in the practice of mathematics. The soundness of this definition amounts to the belief that a published proof can, in principle, be converted into a formal proof. However, outside the field of automated proof assistants, this is rarely done in practice.
A famous example [2] is the contingent sea battle case found in Aristotle's work, De Interpretatione, chapter 9: Imagine P refers to the statement "There will be a sea battle tomorrow." The principle of bivalence here asserts: Either it is true that there will be a sea battle tomorrow, or it is false that there will be a sea battle tomorrow.
Logical constants determine whether a statement is a logical truth when they are combined with a language that limits its meaning. Therefore, until it is determined how to make a distinction between all logical constants regardless of their language, it is impossible to know the complete truth of a statement or argument.