Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Robert Bruce Spencer (born February 27, 1962) [1] [2] is an American anti-Muslim [15] author and blogger, and one of the key figures of the counter-jihad movement. [16] [17] Spencer founded and has directed the blog Jihad Watch since 2003. In 2010 he co-founded the organization Stop Islamization of America with Pamela Geller. [18]
Spencer starts looking at the Quran; he notes many of its narratives resemble the Bible's, such as its human origin myth of Adam and Eve. Spencer also compares the accounts presented in the Quran with those in the apocrypha and other non-canonical works, including the Talmud and the Syriac Infancy Gospel. Other religions he assumes to have been ...
The site features commentary by multiple editors, and its most frequent editor is Robert Spencer. [15] It is a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center . [ 14 ] Dhimmi Watch was a blog on the Jihad Watch site, also maintained by Spencer, focusing on alleged outrages by Muslims.
This is from one of the articles quoted. So clearly people think they have found errors in his work. The point of this article is to present a balanced view - there is a section for Spencer's views, and a section for criticisms. Let's stick with the structure that most other pages are using. - 06 Dec 2005
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Dual Seedline Christian Identity proponents –those who believe that Eve bore children with Satan as well as with Adam – believe that Eve was seduced by the Serpent (Satan), shared her fallen state with Adam by having sex with him, and gave birth to twins with different fathers: Satan's son Cain and Adam's son Abel. This belief is referred ...
Discover the best free online games at AOL.com - Play board, card, casino, puzzle and many more online games while chatting with others in real-time.
In The Catholic World Report J. Mark Nicovich questioned Spencer's claim that Islam's historical origins had not been subjected to "historical criticism on any significant scale", and said that Spencer's work is "fatally flawed by numerous logical fallacies and poor source criticism."