enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    In R v Burgess [1991] 2 QB 92 the Court of Appeal ruled that the defendant, who wounded a woman by hitting her with a video recorder while sleepwalking, was insane under the M'Naghten Rules. Lord Lane said, "We accept that sleep is a normal condition, but the evidence in the instant case indicates that sleepwalking, and particularly violence in ...

  3. Talk:M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:M'Naghten_rules

    Here's an example of a law review article asserting the contrary, that the judgement of "wrong" is not merely of the legal but of the moral quality of the act in question, arguing from other courts' findings on the meaning of "wrong" intended in the M'Naghten Rules:

  4. Edward Drummond - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Drummond

    Edward Drummond (30 March 1792 – 25 January 1843) was a British civil servant, and was Personal Secretary to several British prime ministers.He was fatally shot by Daniel M'Naghten, whose subsequent trial gave rise to the M'Naghten rules, the legal test of insanity used in many common law jurisdictions.

  5. Daniel M'Naghten - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_M'Naghten

    Daniel M'Naghten. Photographed by Henry Hering c 1856. Daniel M'Naghten (sometimes spelt McNaughtan or McNaughton; 1813 – 3 May 1865) was a Scottish woodturner who assassinated English civil servant Edward Drummond while suffering from paranoid delusions.

  6. The husband-wife legal team working on two of today’s ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/husband-wife-legal-team-working...

    From 2014 to 2021, Karen was the second-in-command in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, which brought notable cases against defendants including Harvey Weinstein and Allen Weisselberg ...

  7. Tanner v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_v._United_States

    Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that juror testimony could not be used to discredit or overturn a jury verdict, even if the jury had been consuming copious amounts of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine throughout the course of the trial.

  8. These Homeowners Didn't Know They Had an Ant Problem ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/homeowners-didnt-know-had...

    A weekend getaway became a nightmare for one couple when biting ants fell from the ceiling onto them as they slept. Here's how to keep it from happening to you.

  9. US Supreme Court declines to let RFK Jr drop off ballot in ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-declines-let...

    (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court denied on Tuesday a bid by former independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has endorsed Republican Donald Trump, to be removed from the ...