enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L_Schuler_AG_v_Wickman...

    Wickman alleged that Schuler AG wrongfully terminated their contract for Wickman to visit car makers to market Schuler's panel presses, as their sole representative for four-and-a-half years, even though Wickman had failed to make visits. Clause 7(b) said, ‘It shall be a condition of this agreement that [Wickman] shall send its ...

  3. Category:Lord Wilberforce cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Category:Lord_Wilberforce_cases

    Pages in category "Lord Wilberforce cases" The following 16 pages are in this category, out of 16 total. ... L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd; M.

  4. Category:House of Lords cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:House_of_Lords_cases

    L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd; Lawrence v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; LB (Plastics) Ltd v Swish Products Ltd; Learoyd v Whiteley; Lennard's Carrying Co Ltd v Asiatic Petroleum Co Ltd; Lewisham LBC v Malcolm; Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd; Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd; List of trials of peers in ...

  5. Talk : L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:L_Schuler_AG_v...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  6. White & Carter (Councils) Ltd v McGregor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_&_Carter_(Councils...

    White and Carter (Councils) Ltd. v McGregor [1961] UKHL 5 is a Scottish and English contract law case, concerning the right to terminate a contract and the duty to mitigate. Facts [ edit ]

  7. Daimler AG v. Bauman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daimler_AG_v._Bauman

    Daimler AG v. Bauman , 571 U.S. 117 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. [ 1 ]

  8. Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Foundries_(1926...

    Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 is an important English contract law and company law case. In the field of contracts it is well known for MacKinnon LJ 's decision in the Court of Appeal, where he put forth the " officious bystander " formulation for determining what terms should be implied into agreements by the courts.

  9. Labour Conventions Reference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_Conventions_Reference

    Canada (AG) v Ontario (AG) [1937] UKPC 6, [1937] A.C. 326, also known as the Labour Conventions Reference, is a landmark decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council concerning the distinct nature of federal and provincial jurisdiction in Canadian federalism.