Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Let us assume that the standard direct material cost of widget is as follows: 2 kg of unobtainium at € 60 per kg ( = € 120 per unit). Let us assume further that during the given period, 100 widgets were manufactured, using 212 kg of unobtainium which cost € 13,144. Under those assumptions direct material price variance can be calculated as:
Price variance (Vmp) is a term used in cost accounting which denotes the difference between the expected cost of an item (standard cost) and the actual cost at the time of purchase. [1] The price of an item is often affected by the quantity of items ordered, and this is taken into consideration.
In variance analysis, direct material usage (efficiency, quantity) variance is the difference between the standard quantity of materials that should have been used for the number of units actually produced, and the actual quantity of materials used, valued at the standard cost per unit of material.
The variance of randomly generated points within a unit square can be reduced through a stratification process. In mathematics , more specifically in the theory of Monte Carlo methods , variance reduction is a procedure used to increase the precision of the estimates obtained for a given simulation or computational effort. [ 1 ]
In variance analysis (accounting) direct material total variance is the difference between the actual cost of actual number of units produced and its budgeted cost in terms of material. Direct material total variance can be divided into two components: the direct material price variance, the direct material usage variance.
using a target variance for an estimate to be derived from the sample eventually obtained, i.e., if a high precision is required (narrow confidence interval) this translates to a low target variance of the estimator. the use of a power target, i.e. the power of statistical test to be applied once the sample is collected.
In this case, T 2 is more efficient than T 1 if the variance of T 2 is smaller than the variance of T 1, i.e. > for all values of θ. This relationship can be determined by simplifying the more general case above for mean squared error; since the expected value of an unbiased estimator is equal to the parameter value, E [ T ] = θ ...
This algorithm can easily be adapted to compute the variance of a finite population: simply divide by n instead of n − 1 on the last line.. Because SumSq and (Sum×Sum)/n can be very similar numbers, cancellation can lead to the precision of the result to be much less than the inherent precision of the floating-point arithmetic used to perform the computation.