Ads
related to: court cases legal case summary template printable form irs gov 8822 buslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
dochub.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court concerned with U.S. income tax law. [1] The case is cited as part of the basis for two legal doctrines: the business purpose doctrine and the doctrine of substance over form.
It is regarding the statutory interpretation of 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c) and whether the tax court would have jurisdiction over petitions to the tax court if the petition exceeded the 30 days time frame. In a unanimous decision by the court, they ruled that 30 day timeline is non-jurisdictional and is protected by equitable tolling .
3) Denying the deduction does not violate the Free Exercise Clause because the government interest in a "maintaining a sound tax system" overcomes the burden of having less money to access auditing and training sessions (which does not stem from a doctrinal obligation). Court membership; Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices
Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), was a tax case before the United States Supreme Court that is notable for the following holdings: . A pro rata stock dividend where a shareholder received no actual cash or other property and retained the same proportionate share of ownership of the corporation as was held prior to the dividend by the shareholder was not income to the shareholder under ...
Arrowsmith v. Commissioner, 344 U.S. 6 (1952), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case regarding taxation. The case involves taxpayers who liquidated a corporation in 1937. The taxpayers (properly) reported the income from the liquidation as long-term capital gains, thus obtaining a preferential tax rate. Subsequent to the liquidation in ...
United States, 633 F. Supp. 912 (D. Nev. 1986), [1] was a federal tax refund case, decided in 1986, regarding the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the gambling income of a professional gambler. Because of this case, gambling winnings in the United States can in certain cases be treated as business income for federal income tax purposes.
The Tax Court noted prior decisions that held a taxpayer to have constructively received funds as of the time of attempted delivery when the taxpayer made a decision to be unavailable to receive that delivery. In this case, the court decided that this was not a conscious decision on the part of the taxpayer to be unavailable.
The district court ruled in favor of KSR, [3] but the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed in January 2005. [4] Oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court on November 28, 2006. The petitioner, KSR, was represented by James W. Dabney and patent law academic John F. Duffy. Deputy solicitor general Thomas G. Hungar represented the ...
Ads
related to: court cases legal case summary template printable form irs gov 8822 buslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
dochub.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month