Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356 (2010), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that criminal defense attorneys must advise noncitizen clients about the deportation risks of a guilty plea .
"Criminal Defense after Padilla v. Kentucky". 26 Georgetown Immigration Law Review 475 (2012). SSRN 2281612. García Hernández, César Cuauhtémoc. "Creating Crimmigration". 2013 Brigham Young University Law Review 1457. SSRN 2393662. García Hernández, César Cuauhtémoc. "Immigration Detention as Punishment". UCLA Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 5 ...
Padilla (surname) Padilla v. Kentucky, a United States Supreme Court case pertaining to the immigration consequences faced by lawful permanent residents who are convicted of crimes, and their rights to be warned of those consequences
Constitutional law of the United States; Overview; Articles; Amendments; History; Judicial review; Principles; Separation of powers; Individual rights; Rule of law
Padilla v. Kentucky held that the Sixth Amendment made it mandatory for criminal defense attorneys to advise non-citizen clients about the deportation risks of a guilty plea. [2] While Padilla v. Kentucky was a case related to immigration and deportation, Justice Scalia worried that there was "no logical stopping point" to how Padilla v.
90.2% 83/92 8 3 2 2 15 Associate Justice: John Paul Stevens: Gerald Ford: December 19, 1975 72.5% 66/91 6 13 2 12 33 Associate Justice: Antonin Scalia: Ronald Reagan: September 26, 1986 87% 80/92 8 15 0 6 29 Associate Justice: Anthony Kennedy: Ronald Reagan: February 18, 1988 90.2% 83/92 9 8 0 4 21 Associate Justice: Clarence Thomas: George H ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
A citation of this case could take the form U.1968.84/2H, UfR 1968 84/2 H, Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen 1968, p. 84/2, or something similar. In this case U , UfR and Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen identify the reporter, 1968 identifies the year or volume, 84 identifies the starting page, /2 indicates that the judgment is the second one on that particular ...