Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The female gaze is a feminist theory term referring to the gaze of the female spectator, character or director of an artistic work, but more than the gender it is an issue of representing women as subjects having agency. As such, people of any gender can create films with a female gaze.
The matrixial gaze offers the female the position of a subject, not of an object, of the gaze, while deconstructing the structure of the subject itself, and offers border-time, border-space and a possibility for compassion and witnessing. Ettinger's notions articulate the links between aesthetics, ethics and trauma. [18]
Using clips from hundreds of movies (including her own fictional films), Menkes explores the sexual politics of cinematic shot design; she also includes interviews with women and nonbinary artists, film theorists, and scholars (Joey Soloway, Julie Dash, Catherine Hardwicke, Eliza Hittman and Laura Mulvey), who discuss "the exploitative effects ...
See the original post on Youtube Good Luck to You, Leo Grande Emma Thompson stars in this steamy comedy about a retired teacher searching for the adventurous sex life denied to her by her late ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The physical appearance, body image, social norms, and beauty of women have always been portrayed in media falsely and unrealistically. In ads, music videos, and films, girls and women are shown as objects, and their humanity is diminished. The exploitation of women's bodies is used for advertising everything for entertainment. [18]
The Matrixial Gaze is a 1995 book by artist, psychoanalyst, clinical psychologist, writer and painter Bracha L. Ettinger. [1] It is a work of feminist film theory that examines the gaze as described by Jacques Lacan , criticises it, and offers an original theory concerning feminine and female gaze .
In the early 1970s, Christian Metz and Laura Mulvey separately explored aspects of the "gaze" in the cinema, Metz stressing the viewer's identification with the camera's vision, [8] - an identification largely "constructed" by the film itself [9] - and Mulvey the fetishistic aspects of (especially) the male viewer's regard for the onscreen female body.