Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The substantial disruption test is a criterion set forth by the United States Supreme Court, in the leading case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). [1]
But Des Moines leaders are revisiting the city's policies on homeless encampments in light of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in late June that determined people experiencing homelessness can be ...
The legislation was published 20 days after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an Oregon city could arrest and punish people for camping in public without violating the Constitution. The ruling ...
Following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Des Moines leaders look to ban camping and reduce time for people to remove belongings from public spaces Des Moines proposes 'harder-line' on homelessness ...
The children's fathers filed suit in the U.S. District Court, which upheld the decision of the Des Moines school board. A tie vote in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit meant that the U.S. District Court's decision continued to stand, which forced the Tinkers and Eckhardts to appeal to the Supreme Court directly.
Iowa's capital city is revisiting its policy on homeless encampments with a more "assertive" focus on the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling that people experiencing homelessness can ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Supreme Court wrestled with major questions about the growing issue of homelessness on Monday as it considered whether cities can punish people for sleeping outside when shelter space is lacking.