enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Halbert v. Michigan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halbert_v._Michigan

    Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605 (2005), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Michigan law (Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 770.3a (West 2000)), which denied public counsel for defendants appealing a conviction on a plea, violated the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [1]

  3. Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Department_of...

    Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints. The Court held 6-3 that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure." However, upon remand to the Michigan Supreme Court, that court held ...

  4. Nolo contendere - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolo_contendere

    A nolo contendere plea has the same immediate effects as a plea of guilty, but may have different residual effects or consequences in future actions. For instance, a conviction arising from a nolo contendere plea is subject to any and all penalties, fines, and forfeitures of a conviction from a guilty plea in the same case, and can be considered as an aggravating factor in future criminal actions.

  5. List of U.S. states by Alford plea usage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by...

    This list of U.S. states by Alford plea usage documents usage of the form of guilty plea known as the Alford plea in each of the U.S. states in the United States. An Alford plea (also referred to as Alford guilty plea [1] [2] [3] and Alford doctrine [4] [5] [6]) in the law of the United States is a guilty plea in criminal court, [7] [8] [9] where the defendant does not admit the act and ...

  6. On July 25, a judge submitted a response denying the request, stating that based on past Supreme Court cases, Huger’s “roadside investigation” did not require her to be read Miranda rights.

  7. Woman pleads guilty in DUI crash that killed newlywed bride ...

    www.aol.com/woman-accused-dui-crash-killed...

    A woman accused in a DUI crash that killed a bride on her wedding night in South Carolina and injured three others, including the groom, pleaded guilty to multiple charges Monday afternoon and was ...

  8. Michigan driver whose virtual court hearing went viral never ...

    www.aol.com/news/michigan-driver-whose-virtual...

    A man who went viral after driving during a virtual court proceeding over his suspended license never even had one to begin with — from any state, ever, a Michigan judge said at a hearing Wednesday.

  9. Expungement in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expungement_in_the_United...

    Section 991(c) Expungement is available if a person has been given a deferred sentence and the conditions of the deferred sentence have been met. Immediate court records will be sealed under Section 991(c) but the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation will show that a person "plead not guilty, case dismissed." [52]