enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milkovich_v._Lorain...

    Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that rejected the argument that a separate opinion privilege existed against libel. [1]

  3. Gibson's Bakery v. Oberlin College - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson's_Bakery_v._Oberlin...

    Gibson's Bakery is a fifth-generation family business established in Oberlin, Ohio, in 1885. [5] [6] Half of the city's 8,000 residents are students or employees—3,000 and 1,000 respectively—of Oberlin College. [7]

  4. Food libel laws - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_libel_laws

    The case went to trial in June, 2017. Under South Dakota's Agricultural Food Products Disparagement Act, BPI could have received as much as $5.7 billion in statutory trebled damages were ABC News found liable. [18] [19] After the case had been tried for only three out of the expected eight weeks, ABC News and BPI reached a settlement of $177 ...

  5. Victims of defamation get more time to sue, Ohio Supreme ...

    www.aol.com/victims-defamation-more-time-sue...

    In a 5-2 decision Thursday, the Ohio Supreme Court said victims of defamation should get more time to pursue lawsuits.

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Rights of the media and public figures in defamation suits Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States: 424 U.S. 800 (1976) Abstention doctrine: Dann v. Johnston: 425 U.S. 219 (1976) Early case on the patentability of the business method patent: Hills v. Gautreaux: 425 U.S. 284 (1976) Fifth Amendment and Civil Rights Act of 1964 ...

  7. TikTok shareholders who make any ‘disparaging statement ...

    www.aol.com/finance/tiktok-shareholders-critical...

    The law in California, where TikTok and Ryan are based, says that non-disparagement clauses can’t stop employees from speaking out about retaliation, discrimination, harassment, and other ...

  8. List of tort cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tort_cases

    Kasturilal Ralia Ram V. The State of Uttar Pradesh 1965 AIR 1039; 1965 SCR (1) 375 : is a Landmark case on Constitution of India, 1950, Art. 300(1)-State Liability for tortious acts of its servants. Owen Diaz vs. Tesla, 137 million dollars in damages to a Tesla, Inc. employee who faced racial harassment. [1] [2]

  9. CNN defamation trial: Losing case expected but still a bad ...

    www.aol.com/news/cnn-defamation-trial-losing...

    A CNN employee says losing a high-profile defamation case this week might have been expected inside the network, but that didn't stop it from leaving a mark. "Being found liable for defamation and ...