enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Acceptance of responsibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_responsibility

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that "lack of remorse" and "acceptance of responsibility" can be separate factors and that a district court may consider each independently of the other. [4] The concept of remorse, within the framework of federal sentencing law, has been described as posing epistemological problems. [5]

  3. United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Federal...

    The United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines are rules published by the U.S. Sentencing Commission that set out a uniform policy for sentencing individuals and organizations convicted of felonies and serious (Class A) misdemeanors [1] in the United States federal courts system. The Guidelines do not apply to less serious misdemeanors or ...

  4. United States federal probation and supervised release

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal...

    The life cycle of federal supervision for a defendant. United States federal probation and supervised release are imposed at sentencing. The difference between probation and supervised release is that the former is imposed as a substitute for imprisonment, [1] or in addition to home detention, [2] while the latter is imposed in addition to imprisonment.

  5. Frye standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frye_standard

    In United States law, the Frye standard, Frye test, or general acceptance test is a judicial test used in some U.S. state courts to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence. It provides that expert opinion based on a scientific technique is admissible only when the technique is generally accepted as reliable in the relevant scientific ...

  6. Federal Rules of Evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence

    On December 1, 2011, the restyled Federal Rules of Evidence became effective. [13] Since the early 2000s, an effort had been underway to restyle the Federal Rules of Evidence as well as other federal court rules (e.g. the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). According to a statement by the advisory committee that had drafted the restyled rules ...

  7. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_v._Merrell_Dow...

    The Federal Rules of Evidence govern the admission of scientific evidence in a trial held in federal court. They require the trial judge to act as a gatekeeper before admitting the evidence, determining that the evidence is scientifically valid and relevant to the case at hand. Court membership; Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices

  8. Procedures of the Supreme Court of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedures_of_the_Supreme...

    Generally, the Court's decision is the opinion which a majority (five or more) of justices have joined. In rare instances, the Court will issue a plurality opinion in which four or fewer Justices agree on one opinion, but the others are so fractured that they cannot agree on a position. In this circumstance, in order to determine what the ...

  9. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil...

    Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Official text in pdf format, from the administrative office of the Federal court system) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Latest Edition (www.federalrulesofcivilprocedure.org) 2016-2017 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Effective on December 1, 2016)