enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ysleta_del_Sur_Pueblo_v._Texas

    Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with whether the state of Texas could control and regulate gambling on Texan Native American reservations. In a 5–4 decision issued in June 2022, the Court ruled that the Restoration Act bans only gaming activities also banned by the state of ...

  3. A Fort Worth family claimed a federal law was racist. The ...

    www.aol.com/fort-worth-family-claimed-federal...

    The U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal protections for Native American children on Thursday in a case that originated in Fort Worth. In 2017, a Fort Worth couple filed a lawsuit regarding their ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of U.S. Supreme Court cases involving Native American Tribes.Included in the list are Supreme Court cases that have a major component that deals with the relationship between tribes, between a governmental entity and tribes, tribal sovereignty, tribal rights (including property, hunting, fishing, religion, etc.) and actions involving members of tribes.

  5. The Supreme Court just dealt a big blow to tribal ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-gave-states-more...

    The Supreme Court ruled in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta that state governments have the authority to prosecute certain cases on tribal lands, effectively undermining centuries of legal precedent.

  6. Indian country jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_country_jurisdiction

    Over time, federal statutes and Supreme Court rulings have designated more or less power to tribal governments, depending on federal policy toward Indians. Numerous Supreme Court decisions have created important precedents in Indian country jurisdiction, such as Worcester v. Georgia, Oliphant v. Suquamish Tribe, Montana v.

  7. Court rules Biden’s broad amnesty plan illegal - AOL

    www.aol.com/court-rules-biden-broad-amnesty...

    (The Center Square) – A federal judge in Texas has struck down President Joe Biden’s plan to fast-track citizenship for a wide swath of illegal foreign nationals. In June, Biden announced a ...

  8. Two more Texas wins in court: sweeping small business ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/two-more-texas-wins-court-182900407.html

    (The Center Square) – The state of Texas has two more wins in court, in a sweeping small business federal regulatory action that a federal judge ruled is unconstitutional and a federal agency ...

  9. Lucero v. United States (1869) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucero_v._United_States_(1869)

    The ruling is that if an Indian group doesn't meet the criteria of being a tribe, then the land won't be given back. In Montoya v. United States, the idea of what qualifies as an Indian was revisited and thus a definition of tribe was ruled. It was ruled that a tribe has to be a body of Indians of a similar race that is united under a ...