Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 3-Partition the goal is to partition S into m = n/3 subsets, not just a fixed number of subsets, with equal sum. Partition is "easier" than 3-Partition: while 3-Partition is strongly NP-hard, Partition is only weakly NP-hard - it is hard only when the numbers are encoded in non-unary system, and have value exponential in n.
Horizontal partitioning splits one or more tables by row, usually within a single instance of a schema and a database server. It may offer an advantage by reducing index size (and thus search effort) provided that there is some obvious, robust, implicit way to identify in which partition a particular row will be found, without first needing to search the index, e.g., the classic example of the ...
Another special case called 3-partitioning is when the number of items in each subset should be at most 3 (k = 3). Deciding whether there exists such a partition with equal sums is exactly the 3-partition problem, which is known to be strongly NP-hard. There are approximation algorithms that aim to find a partition in which the sum is as nearly ...
Let A be the sum of the negative values and B the sum of the positive values; the number of different possible sums is at most B-A, so the total runtime is in (()). For example, if all input values are positive and bounded by some constant C , then B is at most N C , so the time required is O ( N 2 C ) {\displaystyle O(N^{2}C)} .
In computer science, greedy number partitioning is a class of greedy algorithms for multiway number partitioning. The input to the algorithm is a set S of numbers, and a parameter k. The required output is a partition of S into k subsets, such that the sums in the subsets are as nearly equal as possible. Greedy algorithms process the numbers ...
[1]: sec.5 The problem is parametrized by a positive integer k, and called k-way number partitioning. [2] The input to the problem is a multiset S of numbers (usually integers), whose sum is k*T. The associated decision problem is to decide whether S can be partitioned into k subsets such that the sum of each subset is exactly T.
The snowflake schema is in the same family as the star schema logical model. In fact, the star schema is considered a special case of the snowflake schema. The snowflake schema provides some advantages over the star schema in certain situations, including: Some OLAP multidimensional database modeling tools are optimized for snowflake schemas. [3]
The algorithm can be extended to the k-way multi-partitioning problem, but then takes O(n(k − 1)m k − 1) memory where m is the largest number in the input, making it impractical even for k = 3 unless the inputs are very small numbers. [1] This algorithm can be generalized to a solution for the subset sum problem.