enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Piercing the corporate veil - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil

    The view expressed at first instance by HHJ Southwell QC in Creasey v Breachwood, [27] that English law "definitely" recognised the principle that the corporate veil could be lifted, was described as a heresy by Hobhouse LJ in Ord v Bellhaven, [28] and these doubts were shared by Moritt V-C in Trustor v Smallbone (No 2): [29] the corporate veil ...

  3. Perpetual Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Michaelson Properties ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_Real_Estate...

    Perpetual Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Michaelson Properties, Inc. 974 F.2d 545 (4th Cir. 1992), [1] is a US corporate law case, concerning piercing the corporate veil. Facts [ edit ]

  4. Flag of convenience (business) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_convenience_(business)

    For example, because the provisions on "piercing the corporate veil" are corporate governance matters, if a corporation is chartered in California, for example, (which has much more creditor friendly provisions permitting this) is sued anywhere, California law applies, but a corporation chartered in Nevada, which operates only in California, is ...

  5. Kinney Shoe Corp v. Polan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinney_Shoe_Corp_v._Polan

    Piercing the corporate veil: Kinney Shoe Corp v. Polan, 939 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1991), [1] is a US corporate law case, concerning piercing the corporate veil. Facts

  6. Lift the corporate veil - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Lift_the_corporate_veil&...

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lift_the_corporate_veil&oldid=457548729"

  7. Walkovszky v. Carlton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walkovszky_v._Carlton

    Walkovszky v. Carlton, 223 N.E.2d 6 (N.Y. 1966), [1] is a United States corporate law decision on the conditions under which Courts may pierce the corporate veil. A cab company had shielded itself from liability by incorporating each cab as its own corporation. The New York Court of Appeals refused to pierce the veil on account of ...

  8. Reporter Bob Woodward Hits Milestone and Folks Are Impressed

    www.aol.com/reporter-bob-woodward-hits-milestone...

    Veil lifted the same on the C.I.A. while The Commanders examined the military through the lens of the first Bush administration. Just as the TV series The West Wing was approaching its end, ...

  9. Jones v Lipman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v_Lipman

    Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 WLR 832 is a UK company law case concerning piercing the corporate veil.It exemplifies the principal case in which the veil will be lifted, that is, when a company is used as a "mere facade" concealing the "true facts", which essentially means it is formed to avoid a pre-existing obligation.