enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Liquidated damages - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquidated_damages

   Liquidated damages, also referred to as liquidated and ascertained damages (LADs), [1] are damages whose amount the parties designate during the formation of a contract [2] for the injured party to collect as compensation upon a specific breach (e.g., late performance). [3] This is most applicable where the damages are intangible.

3. Anticipatory repudiation - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticipatory_repudiation

   Anticipatory repudiation or anticipatory breach is a concept in the law of contracts which describes words or conduct by a contracting party that evinces an intention not to perform or not to be bound by provisions of the agreement that require performance in the future.

4. Hadley v Baxendale - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadley_v_Baxendale

   Hadley & Anor v Baxendale & Ors [1854] EWHC J70 is a leading English contract law case. It sets the leading rule to determine consequential damages from a breach of contract: a breaching party is liable for all losses that the contracting parties should have foreseen.

5. Accord and satisfaction - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accord_and_satisfaction

   Accord and satisfaction is a contract law concept about the purchase of the release from a debt obligation. It is one of the methods by which parties to a contract may terminate their agreement. The release is completed by the transfer of valuable consideration that must not be the actual performance of the obligation itself. [1]

6. Consequential damages - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequential_damages

   Consequential damages go beyond the contract itself and into the actions that arise from the failure to fulfill. The type of claim giving rise to the damages, such as whether it is a breach of contract action or tort claim, can affect the rules or calculations associated with a given type of damages. [3]

7. Regulatory takings in the United States - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_takings_in_the...

   The "polestar" of regulatory takings jurisprudence is Penn Central Transp. Co. v.New York City (1973). [3] In Penn Central, the Court denied a takings claim brought by the owner of Grand Central Terminal following refusal of the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission to approve plans for construction of 50-story office building over Grand Central Terminal.