enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Absolute liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_liability

    Absolute liability is a standard of legal liability found in tort and criminal law of various legal jurisdictions. To be convicted of an ordinary crime, in certain jurisdictions, a person must not only have committed a criminal action but also have had a deliberate intention or guilty mind ( mens rea ).

  3. Strict liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability

    In tort law, strict liability is the imposition of liability on a party without a finding of fault (such as negligence or tortious intent). The claimant need only prove that the tort occurred and that the defendant was responsible. The law imputes strict liability to situations it considers to be inherently dangerous. [8]

  4. Strict liability (criminal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability_(criminal)

    In criminal law, strict liability is liability for which mens rea (Law Latin for "guilty mind") does not have to be proven in relation to one or more elements comprising the actus reus ("guilty act") although intention, recklessness or knowledge may be required in relation to other elements of the offense (Preterintentionally [1] [2] /ultraintentional [3] /versari in re illicita).

  5. United States tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_tort_law

    Some statutory torts are also strict liability, including many environmental torts. The term "strict liability" refers to the fact that the tortfeasor's liability is not premised on their culpable state of mind (whether they knew or intended to accomplish the wrongful act, or violated a standard of care by doing so,) but, instead, strictly on ...

  6. Regulatory offence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_offence

    An absolute liability offence is a type of criminal offence that does not require any fault elements to be proved in order to establish guilt. The prosecution only needs to show that the accused performed the prohibited act (actus reus). [3] As such, absolute liability offences do not allow for a defense of mistake of fact.

  7. Outline of tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_tort_law

    Absolute liability – The rule in M. C. Mehta v. Union of India, in Indian tort law is a unique outgrowth of the doctrine of strict liability for ultrahazardous activities. Under this principle of absolute liability, an enterprise is absolutely liable without exceptions to compensate everyone affected by any accident resulting from the ...

  8. Types of Risk-Affecting Assets and Liabilities - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/types-risk-affecting-assets...

    Business firms use a financial analysis technique called asset vs. liability management (ALM) to mitigate risk due to a mismatch in their assets and liabilities. A mismatch occurs when assets and ...

  9. R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Sault_Ste-Marie_(City_of)

    The issue before the court was whether the city's offence should be classified as strict liability or absolute liability. The Court of Appeal for Ontario held that the charge required proof of mens rea , which on the facts would acquit the defendant.