enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sterling Jewelers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterling_Jewelers

    Sterling Jewelers is being sued by 69,000 female employees and former employees for sexual harassment and sex discrimination in an ongoing class arbitration proceeding, [11] [12] In February 2017, The Washington Post obtained and reported on declarations made by about 250 women and men who worked for the company.

  3. UPDATE 2-Signet Jewelers unit reaches $175 mln ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/1-signet-jewelers-unit-reaches...

    The settlement averts a Sept. 5 arbitration that would have proceeded on a classwide basis, and subjected Sterling to potential greater liability than if employees pursued individual claims ...

  4. A big ugly sex-discrimination suit is coming to the company ...

    www.aol.com/article/2016/09/15/a-big-ugly-sex...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  5. These Companies Paid Massive Sums to Settle Lawsuits - AOL

    www.aol.com/26-biggest-lawsuit-settlements...

    Sterling Jewelers. $175 Million "Every kiss begins with Kay" suddenly doesn't seem so romantic now that Sterling Jewelers, parent company of Kay Jewelers, Jared and Zales, ...

  6. Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-02-25 Sterling Jewelers ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  7. Talk:Sterling Jewelers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sterling_Jewelers

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  8. Signet Jewelers unit pays $11 mln fines to end U.S ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/signet-jewelers-unit-pays-11...

    The settlement announced on Wednesday calls for Sterling, a unit of Signet Jewelers Ltd, to pay $10 million to the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and $1 million to the office of New ...

  9. Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hall_Street_Associates,_L...

    Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that state and federal courts cannot, on a motion to vacate or to modify an arbitration award, expand the limited scope of judicial review specified in 9 U.S.C. §§ 10 and 11, including terms that were agreed upon by the parties.