Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A remand may be a full remand, essentially ordering an entirely new trial; when an appellate court grants a full remand, the lower court's decision is "reversed and remanded." Alternatively, it may be "with instructions" specifying, for example, that the lower court must use a different legal standard when considering facts already entered at ...
The appellate court reversed and remanded the case for a new trial, holding that the second officer's interrogation of Mosley was a violation of the Miranda principles. [1] The State of Michigan appealed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on January 20, 1975.
The first three convictions were reversed by the Mississippi Supreme Court, citing prosecutorial misconduct in all three trials, and remanded for trial again. The first conviction was reversed because of false statements made by the prosecutor to mislead the jury. The second and third convictions involved Batson violations. The fourth and fifth ...
Jury trial in the case was originally scheduled for April 1. ... we reverse Moon’s convictions, ... and remand for a new trial,” Justice John J. Ellington wrote in the Court’s unanimous ...
565 U.S. 1 Decided October 31, 2011. Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded. The Court reversed, for the third time, a judgment of the Ninth Circuit that had set aside the conviction of a woman for the death of her infant grandson attributed to shaken baby syndrome (SBS).
Seventh Circuit vacated and remanded. In 1997, a jury found Joseph Corcoran guilty of murdering four men and he was sentenced to death. The trial court included three factors in its justification of the sentence: the innocence of those killed, the heinousness of the crime, and his potential to commit these crimes in the future.
The trial court suppressed the officer's statement on Fourth Amendment grounds. The Michigan Court of Appeals remanded for an evidentiary hearing, and the trial court reinstated its order to suppress. The Court of Appeals affirmed. The Michigan Supreme Court initially granted and then denied leave to appeal.
The United States Supreme Court summarily reversed that decision and remanded it, stating that the reasoning of the Arkansas Supreme Court denies married gay couples the benefits that are inherent in marriage, thus violating Obergefell. Justice Neil Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Thomas and Alito. In it, he ...