Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Although Justice Gorsuch joined the majority opinion, his concurrence emphasized that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act bars affirmative action. That statute barred discrimination "on the ground of" race, so Justice Gorsuch reasoned that affirmative action was forbidden by statute regardless of any constitutional arguments. [60]
Black student enrollment at Harvard Law took a nosedive after the Supreme Court ruled against race-based admissions last year. The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a major ruling on affirmative ...
Harvard was sued in 2014 by anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions, which accused Harvard of unlawful discrimination against Asian American applicants in its admissions practices.
(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday struck down race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, effectively prohibiting affirmative action ...
The Supreme Court struck down affirmative action at University of North Carolina and Harvard, ends the systematic consideration of race in the admissions process.
Harvard that affirmative action programs in college admissions (excepting military academies) are unconstitutional. SFFA has been described by its opponents as an anti-affirmative action group that objects to the use of race as one of the factors in college admissions. [3]
Schools have scrambled to react to the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision ending the use of affirmative action at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.
In its case against Harvard, a private university, the organization claimed that the school’s admissions policy violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which bars race-based discrimination by ...