enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Homo habilis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_habilis

    There is still no wide consensus as to whether or not H. habilis is ancestral to H. ergaster / H. erectus or is an offshoot of the human line, [19] and whether or not all specimens assigned to H. habilis are correctly assigned or the species is an assemblage of different Australopithecus and Homo species. [20]

  3. Timeline of human evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_human_evolution

    Homo erectus derives from early Homo or late Australopithecus. Homo habilis, although significantly different of anatomy and physiology, is thought to be the ancestor of Homo ergaster, or African Homo erectus; but it is also known to have coexisted with H. erectus for almost half a million years

  4. Homo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo

    Homo (from Latin homō 'human') is a genus of great ape (family Hominidae) that emerged from the genus Australopithecus and encompasses only a single extant species, Homo sapiens (modern humans), along with a number of extinct species (collectively called archaic humans) classified as either ancestral or closely related to modern humans; these include Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis.

  5. Homo erectus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_erectus

    The extant Homo heidelbergensis (cladistically granting Homo sapiens), which was originally African, emerged within the Asian Homo erectus. Contemporary groups appear to have been interbreeding, so any phylogeny like this only gives a coarse impression of the evolution of Homo , and extinct lineage may have partially continued in other groupings.

  6. Archaic humans - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaic_humans

    The category archaic human lacks a single, agreed definition. [11] According to one definition, Homo sapiens is a single species comprising several subspecies that include the archaics and modern humans. Under this definition, modern humans are referred to as Homo sapiens sapiens and archaics are also designated with the prefix "Homo sapiens".

  7. Human evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

    These are proposed species names for fossils from about 1.9–1.6 Ma, whose relation to Homo habilis is not yet clear. Homo rudolfensis refers to a single, incomplete skull from Kenya. Scientists have suggested that this was a specimen of Homo habilis, but this has not been confirmed. [64] Homo georgicus, from Georgia, may be an intermediate ...

  8. Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interbreeding_between...

    About 350,000 years ago a genome of an "erectus-like" creature was injected into the Denisovan lineage. With the separation time of about 2 Ma ago and interbreeding that happened 350 ka ago, the two populations involved were more distantly related than any pair of human populations previously known to interbreed.

  9. Early expansions of hominins out of Africa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_expansions_of...

    Homo habilis could have developed some baseline behavioural flexibility prior to its expansion into the peripheries (such as encroaching into the predatory guild [45] [46]). This flexibility could then have been positively selected and amplified, leading to Homo erectus ' adaptation to the peripheral open habitats. [47]