Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In Germany, file sharing of copyrighted files, for example through peer-to-peer software like BitTorrent, is illegal. Internet service providers routinely transmit the identity of IP address owners to private lawyer firms who are then able to send "cease and desist" letters often demanding the offender to pay €1,000 fines or more.
Similarly, the use of BitTorrent to procure illegal materials could potentially create liability for end users as an accomplice. BitTorrent files can be seen conceptually as a hyperlink. However, it can also be a very specific instruction for how to obtain content on the internet. BitTorrent may transmit or include illegal or copyrighted content.
[6] [7] It allowed users to share content via peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing and was one of the first mainstream uses of this distribution methods as it made it easy for regular users to get free music. Napster's popular use would only be short lived, as on July 27, 2000, it was ordered to be shut down by a federal judge; it was officially ...
In addition to file sharing for the purposes of entertainment, academic file sharing has become a topic of increasing concern, [18] [19] [20] as it is deemed to be a violation of academic integrity at many schools. [18] [19] [21] Academic file sharing by companies such as Chegg and Course Hero has become a point of particular controversy in ...
Peer-to-peer file sharing is the distribution and sharing of digital media using peer-to-peer (P2P) networking technology. P2P file sharing allows users to access media files such as books, music, movies, and games using a P2P software program that searches for other connected computers on a P2P network to locate the desired content. [1]
Plain Dealer Publishing Company, the Ohio Supreme Court held that its four-factor test for determining if speech would be afforded an opinion privilege remained the law in Ohio, despite the ...
A number of file-sharing networks surfaced in Napster's wake, including Morpheus, Grokster, and KaZaA, many of which faced their own legal challenges over infringing behavior by their users. [10] In 2005, MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. was heard by the Supreme Court and is considered by many to be the sequel to the Napster case, addressing ...
The bottom line is that spousal rape is not acceptable, and Ohio can protect survivors and hold all offenders accountable. We need this bill to close this loophole and bring us in line with the ...