enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schneckloth_v._Bustamonte

    Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled that in a case involving a consent search, although knowledge of a right to refuse consent is a factor in determining whether a grant of consent to a search was voluntary, the state does not need to prove that the person who granted consent to search knew of the right to refuse consent under the Fourth ...

  3. Fernandez v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernandez_v._California

    Fernandez v. California, 571 U.S. 292 (2014), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. [1]

  4. City of Ontario v. Quon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Ontario_v._Quon

    The Court unanimously held that the audit was work-related and thus did not violate the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Ontario police sergeant Jeff Quon, along with other officers and those they were exchanging messages with, had sued the city, their superiors and the pager service provider in federal court.

  5. Protecting Or Policing? - The Huffington Post

    data.huffingtonpost.com/2016/school-police/nasro

    A coalition of over 100 education and civil rights groups called the Dignity In Schools Campaign released a set of recommendations in September, saying social workers and intervention workers should replace police officers in schools. There are 1.6 million students across the country who have a cop in their school despite not having a counselor ...

  6. List of consent to search case law articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_consent_to_search...

    Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990) - search valid if police reasonably believe consent given by owner; Florida v. Bostick (1991) - not "free to leave" but "free to decline" on bus; Florida v. Jimeno (1991) - can request officer to limit scope of search; Ohio v. Robinette (1996) - do not have to inform motorist is free to go; United States v.

  7. Schmerber v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmerber_v._California

    Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth Amendment's protection against warrantless searches and the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for searches that intrude into the human body.

  8. Cannabis cafes, A.I. and parking: How new California laws ...

    www.aol.com/news/cannabis-cafes-parking...

    Here's a look at some new California ... Laguna Beach High School officials investigated a student who ... higher replacement wage is paid for by all workers who pay into the state disability ...

  9. State requires parent consent for students to use names ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/state-requires-parent...

    The change is due to a mandate from the state's Board of Education, whose members are appointed by the governor. State requires parent consent for students to use names, pronouns not assigned at birth