Ads
related to: trademark refusal of registration agreement california pdf document downloadrocketlawyer.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Free Legal Documents
Print, Save, Download For Free.
Get Legal Documents w/eSign.
- Ask A Lawyer
Get Legal Advice in Minutes. Real
Lawyers. Real Answers. Right Now.
- Business Formations
Protect Your Assets.
Make Your New Venture Official.
- Save With Rocket Legal+
One Membership For Everything Legal
The Membership That Pays For Itself
- Free Legal Documents
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The authority for this type of registration is set forth in the Lanham Act, which permits concurrent use registration where the concurrent use applicant made a good-faith adoption of the mark prior to the registrant filing an application for registration. Such registrations are most commonly achieved by agreement of the parties involved ...
Marks that cannot themselves be registered as trademarks but have achieved secondary meaning can still be protected from unfair competition; under the 1881 Act, circuit courts do not have jurisdiction over a dispute by two parties of the same state not involving a registrable trademark Clinton E. Worden & Co. v. California Fig Syrup Co.
A suggestive trademark tends to indicate the nature, quality, or a characteristic of the products or services in relation to which it is used, but does not describe this characteristic, and requires imagination on the part of the consumer to identify the characteristic. Suggestive marks invoke the consumer's perceptive imagination.
In the United States, an Office action is a document written by an examiner in a patent or trademark examination procedure and mailed to an applicant [1] for a patent or trademark. The expression is used in many jurisdictions. Formally, the "O" is supposed to be capitalized, since it refers to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. [2]
Under the 1976 Act, federal copyright requires only a fixation of an original work of authorship in a tangible medium of expression. Renewal is not compulsory, and a copyright owner can register at any time. The 1976 Act makes registration (or refusal of registration [8]) a requisite for an infringement action.
Vidal v. Elster, 602 U.S. 286, is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with 15 U.S.C. § 1052, a provision of the Lanham Act regarding trademarks using the name of living individuals without their consent.
Ads
related to: trademark refusal of registration agreement california pdf document downloadrocketlawyer.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month