enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech...

    Under the Miller test, speech is unprotected if "the average person, applying contemporary community standards, [54] would find that the [subject or work in question], taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest", "the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by ...

  3. Double Jeopardy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Jeopardy_Clause

    In the American military, courts-martial are subject to the same law of double jeopardy, since the Uniform Code of Military Justice has incorporated all of the protections of the U.S. Constitution. The non-criminal proceeding non-judicial punishment (or NJP) is considered to be akin to a civil case and is subject to lower standards than a court ...

  4. Everything which is not forbidden is allowed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_which_is_not...

    (2) The power of the state serves all citizens and can be only applied in cases, under limitations and through uses specified by a law. (3) Every citizen can do anything that is not forbidden by the law, and no one can be forced to do anything that is not required by a law. The same principles are reiterated in the Czech Bill of Rights, Article 2.

  5. Freedom of speech in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the...

    During colonial times, English speech regulations were rather restrictive.The English criminal common law of seditious libel made criticizing the government a crime. Lord Chief Justice John Holt, writing in 1704–1705, explained the rationale for the prohibition: "For it is very necessary for all governments that the people should have a good opinion of it."

  6. Due Process Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause

    The courts have generally determined that laws which are too vague for the average citizen to understand deprive citizens of their rights to due process. If an average person cannot determine who is regulated, what conduct is prohibited, or what punishment may be imposed by a law, courts may find that law to be void for vagueness. See Coates v.

  7. Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the...

    The amendment as proposed by Congress in 1789 and ratified by the states: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be ...

  8. Police illegally sell restricted weapons, supplying crime

    www.aol.com/police-illegally-sell-restricted...

    A CBS News investigation found dozens of law enforcement leaders — sheriffs, captains, lieutenants, chiefs of police — buying and illegally selling firearms, even weapons of war, across 23 U.S ...

  9. Espionage Act of 1917 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espionage_Act_of_1917

    The law was extended on May 16, 1918, by the Sedition Act of 1918, actually a set of amendments to the Espionage Act, which prohibited many forms of speech, including "any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States ... or the flag of the United States, or the uniform of the Army or Navy".