enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Strict liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability

    The concept of strict liability is also found in criminal law. Strict liability often applies to vehicular traffic offenses: in a speeding case, for example, whether the defendant knew that the posted speed limit was being exceeded is irrelevant; the prosecutor need only prove that the defendant was driving the vehicle in excess of the posted ...

  3. Strict liability (criminal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability_(criminal)

    In criminal law, strict liability is liability for which mens rea (Law Latin for "guilty mind") does not have to be proven in relation to one or more elements comprising the actus reus ("guilty act") although intention, recklessness or knowledge may be required in relation to other elements of the offense (Preterintentionally [1] [2] /ultraintentional [3] /versari in re illicita).

  4. Philippine criminal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_Criminal_Law

    Republic Act No. 386, the Civil Code of the Philippines (1949). Act No. 3815, the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines (1930). The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Luis B. Reyes, The Revised Penal Code: Criminal Law 20 (1998, 14th ed.). Antonio L. Gregorio, Fundamentals of Criminal Law Review 50-51 (1997).

  5. Human Rights Watch and Commission on Human Rights slam ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/human-rights-watch-commission...

    The Philippine government's plan to change the age of criminal liability from 15 years old to possibly as low as 9 years old has been drawing flak from netizens and concerned parents, and now two ...

  6. Mens rea - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea

    The standard common law test of criminal liability is expressed in the Latin phrase actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, [2] i.e. "the act is not culpable unless the mind is guilty". [3] [4] As a general rule, someone who acted without mental fault is not liable in criminal law. [5] [6] Exceptions are known as strict liability crimes.

  7. People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Philippines...

    People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler (R-MNL-19-01141-CR), also known as the Maria Ressa cyberlibel case, is a high-profile criminal case in the Philippines, lodged against Maria Ressa, co-owner and CEO of Rappler Inc.. [2] Accused of cyberlibel, Ressa was found guilty by a Manila Regional Trial Court on June 15, 2020. [3] [4]: 36

  8. Revised Penal Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revised_Penal_Code

    The Revised Penal Code criminalizes a whole class of acts that are generally accepted as criminal, such as the taking of a life whether through murder or homicide, rape, robbery theft, and treason. The Code also penalizes other acts that are considered criminal in the Philippines, such as adultery, concubinage, and abortion. It expressly ...

  9. Regulatory offence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_offence

    An absolute liability offence is a type of criminal offence that does not require any fault elements to be proved in order to establish guilt. The prosecution only needs to show that the accused performed the prohibited act (actus reus). [3] As such, absolute liability offences do not allow for a defense of mistake of fact.