enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stump v. Sparkman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump_v._Sparkman

    DeKalb County Court House, Auburn, Indiana. The chambers of the Circuit Court judge are at upper left. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), is the leading United States Supreme Court decision on judicial immunity.

  3. Roth v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v.California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment. [1]

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Summers, the Supreme Court held that police officers executing a search warrant were allowed to detain people on the premises while they conducted the search. This case limits that to the "immediate vicinity" of the place being searched, so police searching a basement apartment couldn't search a man leaving from near the apartment in a car.

  5. Moore v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Regents_of_the...

    John Moore first visited UCLA Medical Center on October 5, 1976, after he was diagnosed with hairy cell leukemia.Physician and cancer researcher David Golde took samples of Moore's blood, bone marrow, and other bodily fluids to confirm the diagnosis and recommended a splenectomy because of the potentially fatal amount of swelling in Moore's spleen. [3]

  6. US Supreme Court tosses intellectual disability ruling on ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-tosses...

    (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court threw out on Monday a judicial decision that had spared a man convicted of murder in Alabama from execution because he was found to be intellectually disabled.

  7. Breithaupt v. Abram - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breithaupt_v._Abram

    Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 (1957), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that involuntary blood samples, taken by a skilled technician to determine intoxication, do not violate substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [1]

  8. Early divisions signal bitter internal conflicts as Supreme ...

    www.aol.com/news/early-divisions-signal-bitter...

    From a blockbuster Second Amendment decision to a more technical case about retaliatory arrests, sharp disagreements have emerged on the Supreme Court over the reasoning of recent rulings ...

  9. Other witnesses disagreed, including retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig, a conservative who was appointed to the Court of Appeals in 1991 by President George H.W. Bush and was considered for ...