Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, commonly known as Davis Polk, is an American multinational law firm headquartered in New York City with offices in Washington, D.C., Menlo Park, London, Madrid, Brussels, Hong Kong, Beijing, Tokyo, and São Paulo. The firm maintains an all-equity partnership, with profits per partner of over $7 million.
Chen is a partner in the corporate department of Davis Polk & Wardwell and a managing partner of the Beijing office. An experienced lawyer, he has practised in the New York office since 1992, the Hong Kong office since 1999 and the Beijing office since 2007. [14] [10]
Hong Kong: 6 38 2 46: Domestic 40 Oldham, Li & Nie Hong Kong China: 15 23 6 44: Domestic 40 Lau, Horton & Wise Hong Kong Germany: 11 24 9 44: Domestic 42 Haldanes Hong Kong: 21 22 0 43: Domestic 42 Morrison & Foerster United States: 6 22 15 43: International 44 Tanner De Witt Hong Kong: 17 24 1 42: Domestic 44 ONC Lawyers Hong Kong: 16 24 2 42 ...
This page was last edited on 29 October 2023, at 09:30 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
Through both fate and planning, the two New York firms had record years for Hong Kong listings. As Hong Kong Becomes the Top IPO Market of 2018, Skadden and Davis Polk Reap Rewards Skip to main ...
Rank by PPEP Firm Equity partners 2021/22 PPEP (US$) 1 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz: 91 $8,400,000 2 Kirkland & Ellis: 490 $7,388,000 3 Davis Polk
After graduating from the University of Melbourne, Dapiran moved to Hong Kong in 1999 and joined the law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, where he eventually made partner and was put in charge of the firm's Beijing office. [3] [4] In 2010, he joined the law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell and established its Hong Kong office. [5]
Among the large firms not included in the term are Herbert Smith Freehills; Hogan Lovells; Norton Rose Fulbright; and Stephenson Harwood, which are less profitable. [citation needed] Also, at the time the term was coined, the corporate practice at Herbert Smith (as it was known pre-merger) was focused on privatisation work, which had dried up.