Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Months later on 7 June 2004, TrueCrypt 2.0 was released. [1] The new version contained a different digital signature from that of the original TrueCrypt Team, with the developers now being referred to as "the TrueCrypt Foundation." The software license was also changed to the open source GNU General Public License (GPL). However, given the wide ...
No [2] Boxcryptor: Secomba GmbH 2011 Proprietary: No CGD Roland C. Dowdeswell 2002-10-04 [3] BSD: Yes CenterTools DriveLock CenterTools 2008 Proprietary: Yes Check Point Full Disk Encryption Check Point Software Technologies Ltd: 1999 [4] [5] [6] Proprietary: Yes CipherShed: CipherShed Project 2014 [7] TrueCrypt License Version 3.0 [8] No ...
Version Release date Significant changes 1.0 February 2, 2004 Initial release. Featured support for Windows 98, ME, 2000, and XP.Added plausible deniability for containers (although due to its simplistic nature, the practical value of the "plausible deniability" offered in this version is debatable), [1] and various bugfixes and improvements over E4M.
Some disk encryption software (e.g., TrueCrypt or BestCrypt) provide features that generally cannot be accomplished with disk hardware encryption: the ability to mount "container" files as encrypted logical disks with their own file system; and encrypted logical "inner" volumes which are secretly hidden within the free space of the more obvious ...
Shortly after TrueCrypt version 1.0 was released in February 2004, the TrueCrypt Team reported receiving emails from Wilfried Hafner, manager of SecurStar, claiming that Paul Le Roux had stolen the source code of E4M from SecurStar as an employee.
The TI-99/4 and TI-99/4A are home computers released by Texas Instruments in 1979 and 1981, respectively. [2] Based on Texas Instruments's own TMS9900 microprocessor originally used in minicomputers, the TI-99/4 was the first 16-bit home computer. [3]
VeraCrypt is a free and open-source utility for on-the-fly encryption (OTFE). [5] The software can create a virtual encrypted disk that works just like a regular disk but within a file.
There are potential weaknesses in the implementation of the protocol between the dongle and the copy-controlled software. For example, a simple implementation might define a function to check for the dongle's presence, returning "true" or "false" accordingly, but the dongle requirement can be easily circumvented by modifying the software to always answer "true".