Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The case Rhode v. Bonta, originally Rhode v. Becerra, is challenging Proposition 63's requirement for background checks to purchase ammunition as well as its prohibition against importation of ammunition into the state by residents, unless importation takes place through a licensed ammunition dealer.
In Duncan v. Becerra and Rhode v. Becerra, he struck down portions of 2016 California Proposition 63 that prohibited possession of high-capacity magazines and required background checks for ammunition purchases, respectively. The state appealed both decisions; [7] the ruling in Duncan v. Bonta was reversed by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of ...
Schneider v. New Jersey: 1131 Jenkins v. Georgia: 1132 Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations: 1133 Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America: 1134 Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co. 1135 Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal: 1136 Jaffee v. Redmond: 1137 Shoemaker v. United States: 1138 United States v. Kahriger: 1139 ...
The case is NetChoice LLC v Bonta, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-2969. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Rod Nickel, Jonathan Oatis and Will Dunham) Show comments
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
In May 1990, New Jersey became the second state in the U.S. to pass an assault weapons ban, after California. At the time, it was the most restrictive assault weapons ban in the nation. [72] AR-15 semi-automatic rifles are illegal in New Jersey, and owning and publicly carrying other guns require separate licensing processes. [73]
Bonta’s childhood was steeped in the civil rights movement. His father, Warren, marched with Martin Luther King at Selma, Alabama, in the 1960s, and later moved young Rob and his mother to UFW ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!