Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
DeVillier v. Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [1] [2] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence. Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.
On May 23, 2024, Mullis's death warrant was issued, which scheduled his execution to take place on September 24, 2024, which was four days after his 38th birthday. [ 38 ] Mullis was one of the five inmates across five different states in the U.S. who were slated to be executed within one week between September 20 and September 26, 2024.
On June 28, 2023, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied Rodney Reed a new trial. The appeals court wrote in its 7-1 ruling that Reed had not "demonstrated that he is more-likely-than-not innocent". [51] Reed applied to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, a request which was rejected without comment in July 2024. [52]
The Supreme Court on June 28, 2024, ruled in favor of a participant in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot who challenged his conviction for a federal obstruction crime.
2024 was a landmark year for prosecutions tied to politics. It marked the first criminal conviction of a former president and the first criminal conviction of a sitting president’s child.
That case is scheduled to go to trial on March 25. The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, is reported to have said the trial could last just over a month, which would presumably reveal a verdict by ...
On that same date, the Texas Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence approved a subpoena to allow Roberson to testify before a Texas House committee in relation to his case. [4] On October 16, 2024, the Texas parole board voted unanimously, 6–0, against recommending Roberson's sentence be commuted or his execution delayed.
By midnight Thursday, Roberson’s death warrant dictating the date of the execution had expired, and a spokesperson for the department confirmed a judge would need to order a new date. Texas law ...