enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vicarious liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

    Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.

  3. Outline of tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_tort_law

    Vicarious liability – A form of strict secondary liability arising from respondeat superior. The responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinates, under which, they are responsible for negligent acts committed by their employees during the course of their employment.

  4. Himalaya clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himalaya_clause

    A Himalaya clause is a contractual provision expressed to be for the benefit of a third party who is not a party to the contract. Although theoretically applicable to any form of contract, most of the jurisprudence relating to Himalaya clauses relate to maritime matters, and exclusion clauses in bills of lading for the benefit of employees, crew, and agents, stevedores in particular.

  5. Qui facit per alium facit per se - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_facit_per_alium_facit...

    Qui facit per alium facit per se (anglicised Late Latin), [1] which means "He who acts through another does the act himself", is a fundamental legal maxim of the law of agency. [2] It is a maxim often stated in discussing the liability of employer for the act of employee in terms of vicarious liability."

  6. Respondeat superior - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior

    Respondeat superior (Latin: "let the master answer"; plural: respondeant superiores) is a doctrine that a party is responsible for (and has vicarious liability for) acts of his agents. [ 1 ] : 794 For example, in the United States, there are circumstances when an employer is liable for acts of employees performed within the course of their ...

  7. Tort law in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort_Law_in_India

    Law of Tort, India: Eastern Book Company. ISBN 978-0-7855-3491-4. B.L. Babel (2009). " Apkritya Vidhi (Law of Torts in Hindi)अपक्रत्य विद्यि " . ISBN 978-8-1701-2185-5. Tort Liability for Environment Claims in India : A Comparative View ( 1st ) Author Name: Charu Sharma ISBN 9788131250693

  8. Vicarious liability (criminal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_(criminal)

    The general rule in criminal law is that there is no vicarious liability. This reflects the general principle that crime is composed of both an actus reus (the Latin tag for "guilty act") and a mens rea (the Latin tag for "guilty mind") and that a person should only be convicted if they are directly responsible for causing both elements to occur at the same time (see concurrence).

  9. Vicarious liability in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_in...

    Vicarious liability in English law is a doctrine of English tort law that imposes strict liability on employers for the wrongdoings of their employees. Generally, an employer will be held liable for any tort committed while an employee is conducting their duties. [ 1 ]