Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(JSON Schema Proposal, other JSON schemas/IDLs) Partial (via JSON APIs implemented with Smile backend, on Jackson, Python) — SOAP: W3C: XML: Yes W3C Recommendations: SOAP/1.1 SOAP/1.2: Partial (Efficient XML Interchange, Binary XML, Fast Infoset, MTOM, XSD base64 data) Yes Built-in id/ref, XPointer, XPath: WSDL, XML schema: DOM, SAX, XQuery ...
JSON has objects with a simple "key" to "value" mapping, whereas in XML addressing happens on "nodes", which all receive a unique ID via the XML processor. Additionally, the XML standard defines a common attribute xml:id , that can be used by the user, to set an ID explicitly.
This is accomplished by automatically creating a mapping between elements of the XML schema XSD of the document and members of a class to be represented in memory. Other criticisms attempt to refute the claim that XML is a self-describing language [46] (though the XML specification itself makes no such claim).
JSON-RPC (JavaScript Object Notation-Remote Procedure Call) is a remote procedure call (RPC) protocol encoded in JSON. It is similar to the XML-RPC protocol, defining only a few data types and commands. JSON-RPC allows for notifications (data sent to the server that does not require a response) and for multiple calls to be sent to the server ...
Both XML-RPC and XML require an application-level data model, such as which field names are defined in the XML schema or the parameter names in XML-RPC. Furthermore, XML-RPC uses about 4 times the number of bytes compared to plain XML to encode the same objects, which is itself verbose compared to JSON. [10] [11] [12]
Hypertext Application Language (HAL) is a convention for defining hypermedia such as links to external resources within JSON or XML code. It is documented in an Internet Draft (a "work in progress"), with the latest version 11 published the 10th of October 2023.
W3C XML Schema is complex and hard to learn, although that is partially because it tries to do more than mere validation (see PSVI). Although being written in XML is an advantage, it is also a disadvantage in some ways. The W3C XML Schema language, in particular, can be quite verbose, while a DTD can be terse and relatively easily editable.
Originally tracing it origins back to the EDI standards and other derived XML standards, [5] [6] UBL has evolved to include a broader range of syntaxes such as JSON, thereby enhancing global harmonization and interoperability. UBL now defines a syntax-neutral information model that can be restricted or extended to meet the requirements of ...