enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Color (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_(law)

    The deprivation of rights under color of law is a federal criminal offense which occurs when any person, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person on any U.S. territory or possession to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments ...

  3. Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monell_v._Department_of...

    Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), is an opinion given by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court overruled Monroe v. Pape by holding that a local government is a "person" subject to suit under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code: Civil action for deprivation of rights. [1]

  4. Parratt v. Taylor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parratt_v._Taylor

    The Court also held that a merely negligent deprivation of property under color of state law was actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This holding was mostly overruled by Daniels v. Williams in 1986, which held that a 1983 action only lies for an intentional deprivation of rights.

  5. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961) While municipalities can not be liable under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, individuals acting "under color of law" can be sued for damages for denying the constitutional rights of individuals. (Partially overruled in Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)) Pierson v.

  6. Title 18 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_18_of_the_United...

    § 241. Conspiracy against rights § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law § 243. Exclusion of jurors on account of race or color § 244. Discrimination against person wearing uniform of armed forces § 245. Federally protected activities § 246. Deprivation of relief benefits § 247.

  7. 4 former officers accused of staging sham raid to extort ...

    www.aol.com/news/4-former-officers-accused...

    Four former law enforcement and military officers are accused of conducting a sham raid on a California businessman’s home in 2019 and forcing him to sign away rights to his business worth tens ...

  8. LGBTQ homebuyers: Know your rights under state and federal law

    www.aol.com/finance/lgbtq-homebuyers-know-rights...

    In the longer term, advocates and supporters of the LGBTQ community are backing the proposed Fair and Equal Housing Act, which would amend current civil rights law to ban discrimination on the ...

  9. Pierson v. Ray - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson_v._Ray

    Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court first introduced the justification for qualified immunity for police officers from being sued for civil rights violations under Section 1983, by arguing that "[a] policeman's lot is not so unhappy that he must choose between being charged with dereliction of duty if he does not arrest when he had ...